Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: NATO expansion
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: NATO expansionThe following pages link to Debate: NATO expansion:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- CIMB Group World Universities Peace Invitational Debate
- Featured Debate Digest articles
- Debate: NATO membership for Georgia
- Argument: NATO expansion is being blamed for Russia's problems
- Argument: NATO expansion threatens and antagonizes Russia
- Argument: Russians are feeling betrayed by the expansion of NATO
- Argument: Expanding NATO jeopardizes other initiatives with Russia
- Argument: Georgia is too unstable to be a member of NATO
- Argument: Georgia has made many efforts to improve stability
- Argument: Ukraine already has a close link with NATO
- Argument: NATO already has close links with Croatia
- Argument: NATO membership does not help democratize countries
- Argument: NATO is an outdated alliance against a long gone Soviet threat
- Argument: NATO is merely a puppet of US imperialism
- Argument: NATO has wrongly shifted from being defensive to offensive
- Argument: NATO expansion cynically benefits US military industrial complex
- Debate: NATO membership for Israel
- Argument: NATO is relevant in post-Cold War, helping stabilize Europe
- Argument: The prospect of NATO membership encourages democratic reforms
- Argument: NATO expansion strengthens European political integration
- Argument: NATO expansion will improve the operational capacity of NATO
- Argument: Expansion will make more resources available to NATO
- Argument: NATO would benefit substantially by Egypt's manpower
- Argument: NATO is in an existential crisis in Afghanistan so should not expand
- Argument: Despite difficulties, Afghanistan is a success for NATO
- Argument: NATO is an alliance of democratic values, not just militaries
- Argument: NATO has changed and advanced greatly in post-Cold War era
- Argument: NATO already has close links with Israel
- Debate: Ukraine membership in NATO
- Debate: Is NATO a relic?
- Argument: NATO expansion helps break from Cold War boundaries
- Argument: Morally wrong for NATO to expand without limit
- Argument: NATO expansion is no threat to West-Russian relations
- Argument: NATO expansion does not impair US-Russian relations
- Argument: Reform will continue well after joining NATO
- Argument: Expanding NATO reduces potential of conflict between states
- Argument: Vast majority of Ukrainians don't want to join NATO
