Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Kosovo independence

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search
[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Should Kosovo be independent?

Background and context

Kosovo is likely to declare and achieve independence in 2008. Kosovo's modern day quest for independence stems from its 1999 war with Serbia, in which Serbian forces, under the command of Slobodan Milosevic, enterred Kosovo with the intent to perform ethnic cleansing. The United States and NATO launched in 1999 intervening air-strikes to drive back Serbian forces and successfully end the conflict.

After the war ended, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1244 that placed Kosovo under transitional UN administration (UNMIK) and authorized KFOR, a NATO-led peacekeeping force of 16,000 to remain in Kosovo. Since then, multiple instances of ethnic violence have occurred between Albanians and Serbs, the worst of which was seen in 2004. All of this has renewed calls within Kosovo for independence. In early 2007, a U.N. special envoy proposed that Kosovo declare independence under the close stewardship of the EU, with security and cultural guarantees for its Serbian minority. The Bush administration and most of Europe back the plan, but Moscow has rejected it, creating significant uncertainty regarding the outcome of the movement toward independence. With the passing in December, 2007 of an international deadline to broker a deal between Serbia and Kosovo, many think that Kosovo will declare independence soon.

The debate over Kosovo independence revolves around numerous questions: 1. Does Kosovo have a right to independence? 2. Would independence lead to conflict with Serbia or ethnic Serbians inside Kosovo? 3. Would independence be a force for stability or instability in the region and internationally? 4. Would the quest for Kosovar independence strain relations between Russia and the West? 5. Will Kosovo's move to independence gain the backing of the United States and the EU? 6. Would an independent Kosovo be a viable state? As Kosovo has come closer to independence in 2007 and 2008, the pro and con responses to these questions have become lively around the world, and the fate of Kosovo remains unclear.

See Wikipedia: Kosovo declaration of independence for more background.

Contents

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Kosovo viability: Would an independent Kosovo be a viable state?

[Add New]

Yes

  • Kosovo is capable of governing itself independently - Agim Ceku, Prime Minister of Kosovo, "Succeeding in Kosovo", Washington Post, 12/12/06 - "In the past several years, Kosovo has undergone a remarkable transformation. Most of the responsibilities of governing have been transferred from the U.N. Mission to the Provisional Government. Kosovo has a sound microeconomic foundation, as well as a tax system with few exemptions and low marginal rates. Our labor laws are among the most flexible in Europe and the government has normalized private property laws. While the judiciary and security sector still need deeper, fundamental reforms, Kosovo has by and large developed functional and effective institutions."
  • Kosovo independence will foster national pride and progress Many Kosovars are extremely excited to become independent. They feel that they will take much more pride in their country and hope for its future. This will make them much more likely to work hard for its progression and independent viability.
  • Ethnic divisions make an independent Kosovo the most viable The ethnic divisions between Serbia and Kosovo are very substantial, with Kosovo being 90% ethnic Albanian and Serbia being majority ethnic Serbian. Given the ethnic divisions and history between these two groups, the current arrangement is not viable, and will continue to render Kosovo disfunctional. An independent Kosovo would function more coherently and effectively.
  • An independent Kosovo is the least bad option now Pat Cox, former President of the European Parliament, argued on 2/14/05 that, "Kosovo has nowhere left to go other than independence. Returning to a state relationship with Serbia is anathema to the 90 per cent of the population that is ethnic Albanian, and forcing such a solution would reignite war. Any protectorate option would be seen by Kosovo Albanians as merely the buying of time at their expense. And there are no viable candidate organisations to take on the role: the UN's political capital in Kosovo is exhausted after its five years of inadequate, stop-gap administration, and the EU is not geared or willing to take over Kosovo's governance."
  • An independent Kosovo would actually become part of the EU Kosovo does not intend to "go it alone" as an independent nation, but, rather, to join with the EU. Therefore, Kosovo is not seeking "independence", per se, but rather the opportunity to become a part of the EU, where it can certainly survive as a viable state.
[Add New]

No

  • Kosovo is too underdeveloped for independence Serbs do not enjoy freedom of movement, there is little decentralized power-sharing with local communities, political and legal institutions have yet to mature, political infighting is rampant, crime and corruption are high, patronage systems are deeply embedded in the clannish structure of Albanian society, poverty and economic woes persist, and all of this undermines Kosovo's efforts to attract foreign capital. These are not good conditions for a move to independence and viability.
  • An independent Kosovo would be financially costly to its neighbors M. Bozinovichand, "Kosovo Independence: A Costly Supposition", Servianna.com 4/10/04 - "Kosovo might be of similar fate [to Albania - see below] simply because the proponents of Albanian nationalism want to grant it independence yet it is unclear whether they are also willing to pay an exorbitant tribute to the Kosovo Alabanian government whose taxable base of less then 2 million people earning average of $30 per month cannot yield not 1% of required costs to run that country. Case in point is the $2 billion cost of American presence on only one-fifth of the province. Multiplied by 5 sectors that Kosovo is split into, the cost approaches $10 billion annually and even that presence is insufficient to provide complete security to the area. Factoring in the taxable base and potential revenues that Kosovo government may acquire from various kinds of legitimate enterprise, the independent Kosovo entity may cost foreign sponsors at least $5 billion annually to sustain it in addition to value-depleting activities exported out of there such as drugs, prostitution and weapons that may never be eradicated."
  • An independent Kosovo would have to pay impossible debts to Serbia The Kosovo region owes Serbia a significant amount of money for what the country has invested in Kosovo over the years. It is presumable that Kosovo would have to compensate Serbia for these investments if it were to gain independence, but the cost of this indebtedness could be more than Kosovo can bear.


[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Violence? Would Kosovo independence reduce tension and violence in the region?

[Add New]

Yes

  • Serbia's public will not support a violent response to Kosovo independence Political parties in Serbia have all explicitly ruled out, in recent elections, the idea of starting another war over keeping Kosovo within Serbia's boundaries. This, and the fact that an international military presence remains in Kosovo, makes the possibility of Serbian military resistance to Kosovo independence highly remote.
[Add New]

No

  • Kosovo independence could spark conflict with Serbia around Metrovica Metrovica is a northern Kosovo city existing close to the border with Serbia. 40% of Kosovo Serbs live in and north of this city. A number of concerns surround this area in the event of a Kosovo declaration of independence. First, it is possible that the ethnic Serb policemen there will drop their Kosovo uniforms and enter Serbia, which could be taken as a major red flag on the part of Kosovo nationalists and reason for taking defensive military measures. In addition, it is possible that Serbia will, out of concern for its ethnic population in the north of Kosovo around Metrovica, invade or take measures to protect these groups. These Serbian concerns have led to some proposals to partition the area north of Metrovica away from an independent Kosovo.[1] All of these possibilities are real concerns for the outbreak of violence in the event of a declaration of Kosovo independence.
  • An independent Kosovo might discriminate against Kosovar Serbs. Ethnic Albanians in Kosovo have, in the past, discriminated against ethnic Serbs. The concern is that, without control from a central Serbian government, Kosovo Albanians may feel more free to discriminate against the Serbs in Kosovo.
[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Right to independence? Does Kosovo have a right to independence?

[Add New]

Yes

  • Ethnic Albanians have an historic claim to Kosovo Ethnic Albanians, composing 90% of the population of Kosovo, have a strong historic claim to an independent Kosovo. Kosovo-Albanian nationalism really began in the late 19th century, but their consistent claims to an independent Kosovo were repeatedly unfairly denied after WWI by the Great Powers who gave Kosovo to the more powerful Serbia and by Tito who denied them independence in an effort to placate Serbian desires.
  • Serbian abuses invalidate their sovereignty over Kosovo Serbia performed numerous atrocities against the Kosovars in the war there in 1998 and 1999. This, and the recent denials of these atrocities, leads to the conclusion that the Serbians have foregone their any sovereign right over Kosovo. Whenever a government acts tyrannically towards a group of its people, its sovereignty over that people is put into question, and this is no exception.
  • Kosovo's clear ethnic Albanian majority validates independence| Kosovo's clear ethnic Albanian majority validates independence Kosovo's population is roughly 90% ethnic Albanian. This in itself makes it clear that Kosovo stands distinctly apart from Serbia.


[Add New]

No

  • There is no clear Kosovo identity warranting independence Kosovas does not exactly have a coherent national identity. Yet, its Albanian population is coherent and nationalistic, the Serbian Kosovars in the north generally oppose independence, and do not identify with the Kosovo Albanian desire for independence. This means that it is not quite proper to claim that there is a clear national identity in Kosovo that warrants independence; there is plenty division and opposition to independence.
  • Kosovar Albanians have terrorized ethnic Serbs in Kosovo While it may be true that Serbians have abused Albanians in Kosovo, it may also be accurate that Kosovar Albanians have reciprocated abuse in kind. As such, Albanian Kosovars should have no special right to independence on the basis of Serbian abuses.


[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

International stability: Would Kosovo independence help regional/international stability?

[Add New]

Yes

  • Support for Kosovo independence will reduce Muslim resentment It should be noted that Kosovo's Albanian population is chiefly Muslim, as opposed to the Christian orthodoxy of Serbia. In the Muslim world, the oppression of the Albanian Muslims by the Christian Serbs is viewed with resentment, ostensibly fitting neatly with the story line of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. The continued denial of Kosovo independence is viewed in the Muslim world as just another example of Western and/or Christian oppression, inflaming Muslim resentment and lending fuel to Muslim extremist causes in the region and around the world.


[Add New]

No

  • Kosovo independence would encourage other separatist movements Greece, Cyprus, Slovakia, Romania, and Spain have all resisted Kosovo independence out of concern that it would encourage separatist movements in their own territories. Most of them argue that they will not recognize an independent Kosovo unless it receives the blessing of the EU. The reason is that this would set the more difficult precedent for their separatist movements to have to work through the EU to achieve independence.



[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Serbian opinion: Are Serbians tolerant of an independent Kosovo?

[Add New]

Yes


[Add New]

No

  • Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica.[2]
  • President Tadic.[3]
  • The President of Serbia does support an independent Kosovo


[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

International Community: where does the international community stand?

[Add New]

Yes

[Add New]

No

  • America opposes ethnically-based nation-states Daniel Byman, Policy Analyst, RAND Corporation, 2000 - "Under the UN resolution that ended the NATO war, Kosovo remains a part of Serbia. This status accords with U.S. preferences, as Washington has long opposed partition in principle, particularly if it leads to ethnically based states. Embracing the American ideal - that all peoples can live together regardless of racial, ethnic or sectarian divisions - Washington has consistently opposed the deliberate creation of ethnically homogenous states."
[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Pro/con resources

[Add New]

Yes


[Add New]

No


See also

External links


Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.