Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Egyptian President Mubarak should go immediately

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search
[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Should Mubarak go immediately before the September election?

Background and context

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Argument:

[Add New]

Pro

Mubarak is a tyrant, authoritarian, and bad for the Egyptian people.



[Add New]

Con

Mubarak's ouster will lead to a radicalized Egypt. Successors will be more authoritarian, a tyrannical religious theocracy, and worse overall for the Egyptian people.



[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Arguments:

[Add New]

Pro

Successors will honor the peace deal.

Alternatively, Egypt should not have a peace deal with Israel, or recognize Israel as a country.


[Add New]

Con

Mubarak's ouster will lead to an abandonment of the Egypt/Israel peace agreement, and a shooting war with Israel.



[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Pro

The spread of democracy in the Arab world would free many people from oppression.

Alternatively, establishing a Caliphate is desirable, and will bring honor to Islam and shame and destruction to infidels.




[Add New]

Con

Mubarak's ouster will lead to the toppling of many Arab strongman regimes, destabilizing the region and leading to regional conflict.



See also

External links

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.