Personal tools

Argument: Spending limits foster equal not free speech

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Cato Institute researchers John Samples and Ilya Shapiro wrote that restrictions on advertising were based on the idea "that corporations had so much money that their spending would create vast inequalities in speech that would undermine democracy." However, "to make campaign spending equal or nearly so, the government would have to force some people or groups to spend less than they wished. And equality of speech is inherently contrary to protecting speech from government restraint, which is ultimately the heart of American conceptions of free speech."[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits